One of these brilliant lies in how the world manages the creation and ownership of inventions and ideas. A protectionist approach to intellectual property is designed to protect and prolong the lifecycle of existing technologies, and allow Patent Ideas to capture the earnings using their creations. In a paper published with colleagues from universities in Germany and India, we examined how this makes it tougher for new and a lot more sustainable technologies to get developed and adopted. That explains why nowadays there are other approaches used to move key sectors to more sustainable systems and end this status quo.
Electric car manufacturer Tesla, continues to be doing just that. Tesla CEO Elon Musk “shocked” the world in 2014 as he announced that his company was joining the open source movement and handing out its patents at no cost. You should be aware of the rationale here. Why would a company which had worked so hard to produce and protect its technology looking at the global car manufacturer competitors suddenly give its technology away free of charge?
Tesla initially created a patent portfolio to guard its technology. However, Tesla’s concern that it might be overwhelmed once established car makers ramped up their manufacture of electric cars never got to pass. Instead, it saw the electrical car market stagnate at less than 1% of total vehicle sales. So Tesla changed its strategy from attempting to prevent others from building electric cars to trying to encourage them to the market.
Portion of the reasoning here is that if more electric cars are designed, then more battery recharging stations is going to be built too. This might make electric cars become a little more visible, as well as a more conventional choice. Tesla believes that an open intellectual property strategy can strengthen instead of diminish its position because they build how big the electrical car market, and for that reason, build its very own share from the total automotive market.
This sort of careful handling of intellectual property at company level, maintained by policy-level awareness, can be quite a powerful approach to support the same kinds of transitions to more sustainable technologies in other industries too.
Energy supply faces a range of difficulties: the depletion of natural resources; air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions; nuclear risks; and security of supply. This type of water supply sector is restricted by Invention Website, pollutants, extreme environmental events like flooding and expenses associated with supplying water to communities in poor countries and remote communities. The agri-food sector, meanwhile, is under pressure to sustainably produce more food and to address malnutrition in poor countries.
For these industries to navigate a path around these complications, new knowledge and also the innovations that follow will likely be essential. And then in knowledge economies, intellectual property either can be an enabler or an inhibitor.
When the ownership of intellectual property is fragmented in an industry, it can decelerate technology innovation and uptake, including in the electronics industry where multiple players own complementary patents. However, firms can instead open up their innovation processes and move away from jealously guarded, internal cultures, where intellectual property is utilized to guard and prolong lifecycles. This transformation may see knowledge sharing which leads to accelerated innovation cycles along with a vyltsm rapid uptake of sustainable alternatives within a sector: just what Tesla was hoping for in electric vehicles.
This strategy to intellectual property, so-called “open IP”, is well advanced and mature within the software industry and healthcare. It provides given usage of life-saving medicines to huge numbers of people, especially in developing countries through patent pools, such as the Medicine Patent Pool. This type of project depends on Make My Invention Prototype sharing their intellectual property, but small companies can also play a strategic roles in creating these new, more sustainable systems, and it’s not every about open IP.